In this study, enhancement of water evaporation using electric field has been experimentally evaluated. The study was focused on the effect of corona wind velocity, electrode spacing and air flow velocity on the level of evaporation enhancement. Two sets of experiments, i.e. with and without electric field, have been conducted. Date obtained from the first experiment was used as reference for evaluation of evaporation enhancement at the presence of electric field. The experiments were carried out in the wind tunnel with axial air flow velocities of 0.25, 1.00 and 1.75 m/s and direct electric field with positive polarity implemented by needle electrode at electrode spacing of 2, 3 and 4 cm. Effect of number of electrodes, electrode diameter (1 and 3 mm), electrode tip angle (15, 45, 60 degree and semicircle), as well as electrodes configuration has been investigated. In all experiments electric filed intensity varied from corona threshold voltage to break-down voltage at 0.01 mA current increments. According to the results obtained the level of evaporation increases with increasing voltage and axial air flow velocity. It can be said that using four electrodes with rectangular configuration is more effective on water evaporation rate than one electrode at break-down voltage. In this case the break-down voltage remains almost constant, although the electric current increases as the number of electrodes are increased. At a fixed applied current to a single electrode, increasing electrode spacing from 2cm to 4 cm results in 2.77 times increase in water evaporation rate. The maximum and minimum enhancement in the evaporation rate of water occurred in the arrangements in that four and one electrodes are implemented, respectively. The maximum evaporation enhancement was 8.4377 for axial air flow velocity of 1.75 m/s and the minimum was 4.2768 for axial air flow velocity of 0.25 m/s. Electrohydrodynamic method enables us to increase the evaporation rate without producing extra heat generation. For example, in the arrangement with one symmetrical electrode, the evaporation enhancement for the system in which EHD implemented was 3.1093 times in comparison to that of the system without Electrohydrodynamic. As the input voltage increases, the effectiveness decreases. As the number of the used electrodes increases, the effectiveness was increased by 44.932%. . Finally, by means of experimental data dissolution, a correlation equation is presented for evaporation enhancement and EHD performance for air velocities greater than 1.00 m/s, EHD number, EHD Reynold numberequivalences. Keywords: Electrohydrodynamic (EHD), Corona wind. High electric field, Evaporation enhancement.