Urban wastewater is widely used around the world as a source of water, especially in arid and semi-arid area. According to continuous municipal wastewater production throughout the year and lack of proper conditions for agriculture usage in off season cultivation, and also due to prevention of environmental pollution, applying of wastewater for artificial recharge is one of the most highly recommended methods. With respect to the processes in the soil vadose zone and subsequently in the aquifer, this method would improve wastewater quality and called soil aquifer treatment (SAT).In this study reusing urban wastewater in groundwater recharge and also the effect of absorbent such as hematite-nonwoven geotextile and shred of marble to increase capacity for removing pollutants of this system were assessed. In order to perform the experiences and the precise control of all conditions, nine SAT columns with an inner diameter of 20 cm and height of 2 m were used for 8 months. The columns were poured from sandy-loam soils and two mentioned absorbents as the layers to improve reduction of pollutants. Its common practice was to operate SAT infiltration basins under a cyclic wetting and drying regime so as to restore infiltration rates and assist in the removal of wastewater pollutants in the infiltrate. Applied management options include permanent flooding option as a short-term periods (2-day wetting/2-day drying), medium term periods (7-day wetting/7-day drying) and long term periods (14-day wetting/14-day drying). Treated effluent from the Isfahan University of Technology wastewater lagoons, was used for saturating the soil columns. Water samples were collected from drainage outlets at the regular intervals during the tests with treated effluent. Collected samples were analyzed for Ca, Mg, Na, N, P, turbidity, TSS, pH and EC an also COD and BOD on odd periods of each time management. The removing values of COD, BOD and turbidity in the best cases of 2-day hematite management were 96.68, 98.54 and 97.68 percent, respectively. Also the removing values of pH and Na were 8.14 and 42.56 percent. The removing values of other parameters were as follows: the removal value of TSS and P in 14-day marble sludge management were 63.30 and 97.5, respectively, the removal value of N in 7-day hematite management was 32.44, the removal value of Ca in 7-day marble sludge management was 76, the removal value of Mg in 7-day control management was 89.65 and the removal value of EC in 2-day control management was 26.39 percent. The values stated in each parameter, were the best cases. But in general, the results indicate more than 90% of BOD 5 , COD and turbidity removal after experiments. The average pH of all columns increased except in columns of shred marble. EC was slightly reduced and the amount of Ca, Mg and Na drainage water gradually decreased. Denitrification performance of the columns decreased significantly when the infiltration schedule was switched from 14 days drying/14 days wetting to 7 days drying/7 days wetting cycle. Keywords: groundwater, artificial recharge, wastewater treatment, pollutant, reuse, aquifer, SAT.