Tourism industry, a new approach in human and social development, and economic productivity has crucial role in rural development. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of tourism on rural development from the viewpoint of Targhabeh district residents of Mashhad province. In this research descriptive-analytical method is used. Questionnaire will be the main tool of this study. The population of this study is rural households of four villages of Torqabeh district and Binalood city of Khorasan Razavi province. According to the census of 2016, Torqabeh district had 1950 households which 200 people based on Cochran method selected as the sample of this study. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the research instrument (questionnaire). The value of the economic effects is calculated 0.911 and for social effects is calculated 0.910. For visual and conceptual validity of questionnaire, from perspective of experts were used such as Bartlett’s test and KMO coefficient and for factor validity value of economic effects calculated KMO=0.895 and for social effects calculated KMO =0.865. Data were analyzed by , UCINNET, NETDRAW software and descriptive and inferential statistics (one-sample test, Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, factor analysis and network analysis). The findings show that by the viewpoint of villagers(respondents) the mean economic impacts of tourism are 41 percent. The mean social impact of tourism is 30 percent and the potentials and capacities of rural tourism in the region is 61 percent. The results of correlation analysis showed that if younger people have higher education and higher financial wealth, they have more positive perspective on the economic and social effects of rural tourism. Also, the results of ANOVA test showed that the viewpoints of people in different villages are different from each other according to the economic and social effects of tourism. the viewpoint of Hesar and Kang villagers(respondent) is similar and the viewpoints of Moghan and Azghad villagers are also similar. The results of factor analysis showed that positive economic effects of tourism can be summarized in three factors: job and income development, government support and diversifying of rural economy and positive social effects of tourism also can be summarized in three factors: social infrastructure development, cooperation development and health and educational infrastructure development. As well as there are two negative effects, influential factors: business and brokerage and development of social anomalies. The results of network analysis showed that the network density in trust factor is more than network density in participation factor. The results showed that in the variable of respondents’ trust to influential institutions on tourism development, the highest degree centrality, Betweenness centrality and Eigenvector centrality belonged to private and public sectors. However, in the index of Closeness centrality, trust has been more in manager institution and council. The results also showed that in the variable of respondents' participation with influential institutions on tourism development, the most degree centrality and Betweenness centrality belonged to the private sector and council. However, in the Closeness centrality index, trust has been more in cultural heritage organization of tourism, finally in the Eigenvector centrality of trust has been in manager institution and public sector. Keywords: Sustainable Development, Rural Development, Rural Tourism, Socio-Economic Effects, Factor Analysis, Network Analysis.