One of the methods for facilitating and expediting of balanced development process of regions and also equitable and logical distribution of possibilities or services is profiting and exploiting from relative advantages and extent potential of each region. This strategy is known as regional development and reconstruction process, applied to different cases such as: establishment of commercial free zone or tourism and traveling centers. Regional development is possible by establishment of growth centers in two frames: growth pole theory and trickle down theory. One of the main axies in establishment of growth centers is tourism industry. Tourism industry with special properties can recall the context of development for host region. In fact, by emphasis in regional tourism abilities which are un-developed from economic and social points, we can accelerate the development process in these regions. The main object of this research was to determine the economic and social effects of Zayanderood tourism area in development process of Chadegan town. This research has two parts. The first part was Isard´s regional analysis technique and second part was Delphi and Likert´s procedures. At first section, by using Isard´s technique, we compared 55 indexes of development process in Chadegan and Choghakhor areas. The result indicated the differences between these indexes at 3 time sections: (65-70), (70-75) and (75-80), in Chadegan and Choghakhor towns. Also, it showed that in these time sections, development indexes had no growth, maybe less than mid level in Isfahan province. (60% ,67.3% ,60%). In second part, by using Delphi´s procedures for describing the desired position of tourism area. In sum, the experts have been classified social and economic indexes in 4 branches such as (culture and education), (economy and population), (health and care), (social welfare and development substructure) and then evaluated each of them. By likert´s procedure, the measurement of impression rate of each indexes showed the positive results for 4 branches. Culture and education branch with 11 indexes and 2.22 point, economy and population branch with 12 indexes and 2.51 point, health and care branch with 5 indexes and 2.25 point, social welfare and development substructure with 5 indexes and 2.43 point. All of these indexes had a positive effect upper than mid level in Likert´s method. All result indicated the differences between the present position and desired position with impression growth poles on development near areas.