Tillage operations is used to eliminate any restriction to root growth, seed germination, and seedling emergence and for controlling weeds. Tillage is classified into two types: (a) tillage in topsoil and (b) tillage in subsoil (deep tillage). Deep tillage should be carried out when there is a hardpan in soil or the subsoil is compacted. Deep tillage is also called subsoiling because it is carried out by subsoiler. Deep ripping is considerably expensive, therefore it should practice correctly in order to be effective. Therefore, for increasing deep tillage efficiency (ratio of disturbed soil area to consumed energy), multiple-level subsoiler is recommended. The objective of this study was to compare the operational parameters (draft, specific draft, cross sectional area of disturbed soil, cross sectional area of upheaved soil surface, clod mean weight diameter (MWD) and soil bulk density) of single-level (subsoiler; S), two-level (subsoiler+mid-deep tillage tool; S+C) and three-level subsoiler (subsoiler+mid-deep tillage tool+shallow tillage tool; S+C+Rc) with two arrangements, in-line (L) and offset (O), at three water contents of 0.5 PL, 0.7 PL and 0.9 PL (PL: Plastic Limit) in order to increase operational efficiency in terms of increasing the degree of soil loosening and reducing the energy consumption. For this reason, three tillage tools: (1) winged subsoiler with operating depth of 45 cm (depth of D) as deep tillage tool, (2) a chisel shank with operating depth of 23 cm (depth of 1/2 D) as a mid-deep tillage tool and (3) a rigid shank cultivator with a triangular share (locally called Khishchi) with operating depth of 15 cm (depth of 1/3 D) as a shallow tillage tool were used. The performance of single-level tillage implement (mid-deep) and two-level (mid-deep+shallow) implement with two arrangements, in-line and offset, at three water contents were also tested in the field. The lowest draft and specific draft was obtained at 0.7 PL. Among the tested implements, the S+2C+3Rc+O and S+2C+O had the lowest specific draft. The clod mean weight diameter of the S+2C+3Rc+O arrangement was significantly lower than S+2C+O; therefore, the S-+2C+3Rc+O arrangement is suggested as the best deep tillage implement. By using three-level or two-level subsoiler, the deep tillage can be carried out in a wider water content range. Deep tillage implements with inline arrangement had more uniform clod sizes as compared with offset arrangement. Among tillage implements working in the topsoil, the two-level tillage implement with offset arrangement had the best performance.