Range management is key element. Because Range life is dependent on management approach that governed the Range. In this thesis we studied all national resources laws in 139 village, Range auditory documents in 106 site convention organizer the subject of 56 th item of forest and Range protection and utilizatio law about conflicting fields documents, the documents about deviation from 44 th item and 44 bis of forest and Range protection and utilizatio law, analyzing and comparison the credit of three protection project in a 4 years period and at least studying and controlling the Range management plans at the kabudrahang Country ( one of the hameddan state town), four managerial period are determined. It includes the period before Range nationalization , the period between Range nationalization and Range survey time, the period between Range survey and total Range plan development, at least the period after total Range plan development. In a period before Range nationalization , in this county the ranges were governed by local feudal. Based on a historical documents( some part of Range were gifted by feudal like “amir nezam” ) and the village old-timers views, who remember the period before Range nationalization, the Range were governed by feudal and because of their sensitivity about the way of using Range and the regulation which governed the animals entrance and exit, every year a part of Range was managed by guard. But analyzing the Range survey documents shows that after Range nationalizing and elimination of private owe ness , for a long time a managerial gap and also governmental gap was happen in Range, even in some organizers it was more than 40 years, that period was called the period of Range managerial gap. At the 3 rd period due to governmental weakness that it could not develop and operate Range plans in every organizer by using the 1 st ? of 3 rd item provision of Range protection and utilizatio law, and the next revision at( 1965 cena parlliment) issuance grazing license. Researches about grazing license show government never have had suitable supervision on Range by the grazing license. It is hardly ever seen that an grazing license was extended.
